; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5 ; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print" -aa-pipeline=basic-aa 2>&1 \ ; RUN: | FileCheck %s ; Check that dependence analysis correctly handles flip-flop of base addresses. ; Bug 41488 - https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41488 define float @bug41488_test1(float %f) { ; CHECK-LABEL: 'bug41488_test1' ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 --> Dst: store float %f, ptr %q, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: store float %f, ptr %q, align 4 --> Dst: store float %f, ptr %q, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; entry: %g = alloca float, align 4 %h = alloca float, align 4 br label %for.body for.body: %p = phi ptr [ %g, %entry ], [ %q, %for.body ] %q = phi ptr [ %h, %entry ], [ %p, %for.body ] %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 store float %f, ptr %q, align 4 %branch_cond = fcmp ugt float %0, 0.0 br i1 %branch_cond, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body for.cond.cleanup: ret float %f } define void @bug41488_test2(i32 %n) { ; CHECK-LABEL: 'bug41488_test2' ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 --> Dst: store float 0.000000e+00, ptr %q, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: store float 0.000000e+00, ptr %q, align 4 --> Dst: store float 0.000000e+00, ptr %q, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; entry: %g = alloca float, align 4 %h = alloca float, align 4 br label %for.body for.body: %i = phi i32 [0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %p = phi ptr [ %g, %entry ], [ %q, %for.body ] %q = phi ptr [ %h, %entry ], [ %p, %for.body ] %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 store float 0.0, ptr %q, align 4 %inc = add nuw i32 %i, 1 %branch_cond = icmp ult i32 %i, %n br i1 %branch_cond, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup for.cond.cleanup: ret void } ; Bug 53942 - https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53942 define void @bug53942_foo(i32 noundef %n, ptr noalias nocapture noundef writeonly %A, ptr noalias nocapture noundef %B) { ; CHECK-LABEL: 'bug53942_foo' ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: %.pre = load double, ptr %B, align 8 --> Dst: %.pre = load double, ptr %B, align 8 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - input [S]! ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: %.pre = load double, ptr %B, align 8 --> Dst: store double %.pre, ptr %arrayidx2, align 8 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: store double %.pre, ptr %arrayidx2, align 8 --> Dst: store double %.pre, ptr %arrayidx2, align 8 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; entry: %cmp8 = icmp sgt i32 %n, 1 br i1 %cmp8, label %for.body.preheader, label %for.cond.cleanup for.body.preheader: ; preds = %entry %wide.trip.count = zext nneg i32 %n to i64 br label %for.body for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.body, %entry ret void for.body: ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.body %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 1, %for.body.preheader ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] %ptr1.011 = phi ptr [ %A, %for.body.preheader ], [ %ptr2.09, %for.body ] %ptr2.09 = phi ptr [ %B, %for.body.preheader ], [ %ptr1.011, %for.body ] %.pre = load double, ptr %B, align 8 %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds double, ptr %ptr1.011, i64 %indvars.iv store double %.pre, ptr %arrayidx2, align 8 %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 %exitcond.not = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, %wide.trip.count br i1 %exitcond.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body } ; Bug 53942 - https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53942 define void @bug53942_bar(i32 noundef %n, ptr noalias noundef %A, ptr noalias noundef %B) { ; CHECK-LABEL: 'bug53942_bar' ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: %0 = load double, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: %0 = load double, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: %0 = load double, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store double %0, ptr %arrayidx8, align 8 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: store double %0, ptr %arrayidx8, align 8 --> Dst: store double %0, ptr %arrayidx8, align 8 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; entry: br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.inc, %entry %i.0 = phi i32 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.inc ] %cmp = icmp slt i32 %i.0, %n br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.body: ; preds = %for.cond %and = and i32 %i.0, 2 %tobool.not = icmp eq i32 %and, 0 br i1 %tobool.not, label %cond.false, label %cond.true cond.true: ; preds = %for.body br label %cond.end cond.false: ; preds = %for.body br label %cond.end cond.end: ; preds = %cond.false, %cond.true %cond = phi ptr [ %A, %cond.true ], [ %B, %cond.false ] %and1 = and i32 %i.0, 2 %tobool2.not = icmp eq i32 %and1, 0 br i1 %tobool2.not, label %cond.false4, label %cond.true3 cond.true3: ; preds = %cond.end br label %cond.end5 cond.false4: ; preds = %cond.end br label %cond.end5 cond.end5: ; preds = %cond.false4, %cond.true3 %cond6 = phi ptr [ %B, %cond.true3 ], [ %A, %cond.false4 ] %sub = add nsw i32 %i.0, -1 %idxprom = sext i32 %sub to i64 %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double, ptr %cond6, i64 %idxprom %0 = load double, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 %idxprom7 = zext nneg i32 %i.0 to i64 %arrayidx8 = getelementptr inbounds double, ptr %cond, i64 %idxprom7 store double %0, ptr %arrayidx8, align 8 br label %for.inc for.inc: ; preds = %cond.end5 %inc = add nuw nsw i32 %i.0, 1 br label %for.cond for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.cleanup ret void } ; Pseudo-code for the following IR: ; ; void f(int A[][42]) { ; for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ; for (int j = 0; j < 41; j++) ; (j % 2 == 0 ? A[i][j] : A[i][j+1]) = 1; ; } ; ; There are loop-carried dependencies between the store instruction. For ; example, the value of %ptr0 when (i, j) = (0, 1) is %A+8, which is the same ; as when (i, j) = (0, 2). define void @non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj(ptr %A) { ; CHECK-LABEL: 'non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj' ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: store i32 1, ptr %idx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 1, ptr %idx, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; entry: br label %loop.i.header loop.i.header: %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.i.latch ] %A1 = getelementptr i32, ptr %A, i32 1 br label %loop.j loop.j: %j = phi i32 [ 0, %loop.i.header ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j ] %ptr0 = phi ptr [ %A, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr1, %loop.j ] %ptr1 = phi ptr [ %A1, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr0, %loop.j ] %idx = getelementptr [42 x i32], ptr %ptr0, i32 %i, i32 %j store i32 1, ptr %idx %j.inc = add i32 %j, 1 %cmp.j = icmp slt i32 %j.inc, 41 br i1 %cmp.j, label %loop.j, label %loop.i.latch loop.i.latch: %i.inc = add i32 %i, 1 %cmp.i = icmp slt i32 %i.inc, 100 br i1 %cmp.i, label %loop.i.header, label %exit exit: ret void } ; Pseudo-code for the following IR: ; ; void f(int A[][42][42]) { ; for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ; for (int j = 0; j < 41; j++) { ; int *ptr0 = (j % 2 == 0 ? A[i][j] : A[i][j+1]); ; for (int k = 0; k < 42; k++) ; ptr0[k] = 1; ; } ; } ; ; Similar to the above case, but ptr0 is loop-invariant with respsect to the ; k-loop. ; ; Same as the above case, there are loop-carried dependencies between the ; store. define void @non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj2(ptr %A) { ; CHECK-LABEL: 'non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj2' ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: store i32 1, ptr %idx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 1, ptr %idx, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; entry: br label %loop.i.header loop.i.header: %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.i.latch ] %A1 = getelementptr i32, ptr %A, i32 1 br label %loop.j.header loop.j.header: %j = phi i32 [ 0, %loop.i.header ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j.latch ] %ptr0 = phi ptr [ %A, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr1, %loop.j.latch ] %ptr1 = phi ptr [ %A1, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr0, %loop.j.latch ] br label %loop.k loop.k: %k = phi i32 [ 0, %loop.j.header ], [ %k.inc, %loop.k ] %idx = getelementptr [42 x [42 x i32]], ptr %ptr0, i32 %i, i32 %k, i32 %j store i32 1, ptr %idx %k.inc = add i32 %k, 1 %cmp.k = icmp slt i32 %k.inc, 42 br i1 %cmp.k, label %loop.k, label %loop.j.latch loop.j.latch: %j.inc = add i32 %j, 1 %cmp.j = icmp slt i32 %j.inc, 41 br i1 %cmp.j, label %loop.j.header, label %loop.i.latch loop.i.latch: %i.inc = add i32 %i, 1 %cmp.i = icmp slt i32 %i.inc, 100 br i1 %cmp.i, label %loop.i.header, label %exit exit: ret void } ; Pseudo-code that is approximately semantically equivalent to the below IR: ; ; void f(int A[][32]) { ; for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ; for (int j = 0; j < 15; j++) { ; int offset = (j % 2 == 0) ? 1 : 0; ; A[i][2 * j + offset + 0] = 1; ; A[i][2 * j + offset + 1] = 1; ; } ; } ; ; There are loop-carried dependencies between the two stores. For example, ; A[0][2] is accessed from both the former one when (i, j) = (0, 1) and the ; latter one when (i, j) = (0, 0). ; define void @non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj3(ptr %A) { ; CHECK-LABEL: 'non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj3' ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: store i32 1, ptr %idx0, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 1, ptr %idx0, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: store i32 1, ptr %idx0, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 1, ptr %idx1, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; CHECK-NEXT: Src: store i32 1, ptr %idx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 1, ptr %idx1, align 4 ; CHECK-NEXT: da analyze - confused! ; entry: br label %loop.i.header loop.i.header: %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.i.latch ] %A1 = getelementptr i32, ptr %A, i32 1 br label %loop.j loop.j: %j = phi i32 [ 0, %loop.i.header ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j ] %ptr0 = phi ptr [ %A1, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr1, %loop.j ] %ptr1 = phi ptr [ %A, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr0, %loop.j ] %j2_0 = shl i32 %j, 1 %j2_1 = add i32 %j2_0, 1 %idx0 = getelementptr [32 x i32], ptr %ptr0, i32 %i, i32 %j2_0 %idx1 = getelementptr [32 x i32], ptr %ptr0, i32 %i, i32 %j2_1 store i32 1, ptr %idx0 store i32 1, ptr %idx1 %j.inc = add i32 %j, 1 %cmp.j = icmp slt i32 %j.inc, 15 br i1 %cmp.j, label %loop.j, label %loop.i.latch loop.i.latch: %i.inc = add i32 %i, 1 %cmp.i = icmp slt i32 %i.inc, 100 br i1 %cmp.i, label %loop.i.header, label %exit exit: ret void }