TheRock/compiler/amd-llvm/clang/test/Parser/cxx2a-init-statement.cpp

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a -verify %s

template<int N> struct A {};

using F = bool(*)(int);
extern F *p;
extern int m;

struct Convertible { template<typename T> operator T(); };

void f() {
  int arr1[3];
  for (int n = 5; int x : arr1) {}

  int A<0>::*arr2[3];
  for (int n = 5; int A<true ? 0 : 1>::*x : arr2) {}

  for (int i = 0; int x = i < 2 ? 1 : 0; i++) {}

  F (*arr3[3])(int);
  for (int n = 5; F (*p)(int n) : arr3) {}
  for (int n = 5; F (*p)(int (n)) : arr3) {}

  // Here, we have a declaration rather than an expression.
  for (int n = 5; F (*p)(int (n)); ++n) {}

  // We detect whether we have a for-range-declaration before parsing so that
  // we can give different diagnostics for for-range-declarations versus
  // conditions (even though the rules are currently identical).
  Convertible arr4[3];
  for (int n = 0; struct { operator bool(); } x = {}; ++n) {} // expected-error {{cannot be defined in a condition}}
  for (int n = 0; struct { operator bool(); } x : arr4) {} // expected-error {{may not be defined in a for range declaration}}

  for (int n = 0; static int m = 0; ++n) {} // expected-error {{type name does not allow storage class}}
  for (int n = 0; static int m : arr1) {} // expected-error {{loop variable 'm' may not be declared 'static'}}

  // The init-statement and range are not break / continue scopes. (But the body is.)
  for (int n = ({ break; 0; }); int m : arr1) {} // expected-error {{not in loop}}
  for (int n = ({ continue; 0; }); int m : arr1) {} // expected-error {{not in loop}}
  for (int arr[3]; int n : *({ break; &arr; })) {} // expected-error {{not in loop}}
  for (int arr[3]; int n : *({ continue; &arr; })) {} // expected-error {{not in loop}}
  for (int n = 0; int m : arr1) { break; }
  for (int n = 0; int m : arr1) { continue; }
}